1 Fasel G J, Minow J I, Smith R W, et al. Multiple brightenings of transient dayside auroral forms during oval expansions. Geophys Res Lett, 1992, 19(24): 2429–2432
2 Fasel G J. Dayside poleward moving auroral forms: A statistical study. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100(A7): 11891–11905
3 Sandholt P E, Deehr C S, Egeland A, et al. Signatures in the dayside aurora of plasma transfer from the magnetosheath. J Geophys Res, 1986, 91(A9): 10063–10079
4 Sandholt P E, Farrugia C J. Poleward moving auroral forms (PMAFs) revisited: responses of aurorae, plasma convection and Birkeland currents in the pre- and postnoon sectors under positive and negative IMF By conditions. Ann Geophys, 2007, 25(7): 1629–1652
5 Hu Z J, Yang H G, Huang D H, et al. Synoptic distribution of dayside aurora: Multiple-wavelength all-sky observation at Yellow River Station in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys, 2009, 71(8-9): 794–804
DOI:
10.1016/j.jastp.2009.02.010
6 Lockwood M, Sandholt P E, Cowley S W H. Dayside auroral activity and magnetic flux transfer from the solar wind. Geophys Res Lett, 1989, 16(1): 33–36
7 Lockwood M, Denig W F, Farmer A D, et al. Ionospheric signatures of pulsed reconnection at the Earth’s magnetopause. Nature, 1993, 361(6411): 424–428
8 Zhang Q H, Dunlop M W, Lockwood M, et al. Simultaneous observations of reconnection pulses at Cluster and their effects on the cusp aurora observed at the Chinese Yellow River Station. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115(A10237)
DOI:
10.1029/2010JA015526
9 Xing Z Y, Yang H G, Han D S, et al. Poleward moving auroral forms (PMAFs) observed at the Yellow River Station: A statistical study of its dependence on the solar wind conditions. J Atmos Sol -Terr Phys, 2012, 86: 25–33
DOI:
10.1016/j.jastp.2012.06.004
10 Lui A T Y, Sibeck D G. Dayside auroral activities and their implications for impulsive entry processes in the dayside magnetosphere. J Atmos Terr Phys, 1991, 53(3-4): 219–229
11 Sandholt P E, Farrugia C J, Moen J, et al. Dayside auroral configurations: Responses to southward and northward rotations of the interplanetary magnetic field. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103(A9): 20279–20295
12 Sandholt P E, Lockwood M, Freeman K S C, et al. Midday auroral breakup events and related energy and momentum transfer from the magnetosheath. J Geophys Res, 1990, 95(A2): 1039–1060
13 Drury E E, Mende S B, Frey H U, et al. Southern Hemisphere poleward moving auroral forms. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108(A3): 1114
DOI:
10.1029/2001JA007536
14 Karlson K A, Oieroset M, Moen J, et al. A statistical study of flux transfer event signatures in the dayside aurora: The IMF By-related prenoon- postnoon asymmetry. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101(A1): 59–68
15 Sandholt P E, Farrugia C J, Cowley S W H, et al. Dayside auroral bifurcation sequence during By-dominated interplanetary magnetic field: Relationship with merging and lobe convection cells. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106(A8): 15429–15444
16 Sandholt P E, Farrugia C J, Denig W F. Detailed dayside auroral morphology as a function of local time for southeast IMF orientation: implications for solar wind-magnetosphere coupling. Ann Geophys, 2004, 22(10): 3537–3560
17 Liu R Y, Liu Y H, Xu Z H, et al. The Chinese ground-based instrumentation in support of the combined Cluster/Double Star satellite measurements. Ann Geophys, 2005, 23(8): 2943–2951
18 Greenwald R A, Baker K B, Dudeney J R, et al. DARN/SuperDARN: A global view of the dynamics of high-latitude convection. Space Sci Rev, 1995, 71(1-4): 761–796
19 Ruohoniemi J M, Baker K B. Large-scale imaging of high-latitude convection with Super Dual Auroral Radar Network HF radar observations. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103(A9): 20797–20811
20 Whalen J A, Buchau J, Wagner R A. Airborne ionospheric and optical measurements of noontime aurora. J Atmos Terr Phys, 1971, 33(4): 661–662
21 Murphree J S, Cogger L L, Anger C D, et al. Large scal 6300?, 5577?, 3914? dayside auroral morphology. Geophys Res Lett, 1980, 7(4): 239–242
22 Lockwood M, Carlson H C Jr, Sandhold P E. Implications of the altitude of transient 630-nm dayside auroral emissions. J Geophys Res, 1993, 98(A9): 15571–15587
23 Milan S E, Lester M, Cowley S W H, et al. Meridian-scanning photometer, coherent HF radar, and magnetometer observations of the cusp: a case study. Ann Geophys, 1999, 17(2): 159–172
24 Sandhold P E, Carlson H C, Egeland A. Dayside and polar cap aurora. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002 : 287
25 Pitout F, Newell P T, Buchert S C. Simultaneous high- and low-latitude reconnection: ESR and DMSP observations. Ann Geophys, 2002, 20(9): 1311–1320
26 Moen J, Okasvik K, Carlson H C. On the relationship between ion upflow events and cusp auroral transients. Geophys Res Lett, 2004, 31: L11080
DOI:
10.1029/2004GL020129
27 Zhang Q H, Dunlop M W, Liu R Y, et al. Coordinated Cluster/Double Star and ground-based observations of dayside reconnection signatures on 11 February 2004. Ann Geophys, 2011, 29(10): 1827–1847
28 Zhang Q H, Zhang B C, Liu R Y, et al. On the importance of interplanetary magnetic field |B
y| on polar cap patch formation. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116(A05308)
DOI:
10.1029/2010JA016287
29 Hu Z J, Yang H G, Liang J M, et al. The 4-emission-core structure of dayside aurora oval observed by all-sky imager at 557. 7 nm in Ny-Ålesund,Svalbard. J Atmos Sol -Terr Phys, 2010, 72(7-8): 638–642
DOI:
10.1016/j.jastp.2010.03.005
30 Lockwood M, McCrea I W, Milan S, et al. Plasma structure within poleward- moving cusp/cleft auroral transients: EISCAT Svalbard radar observations and an explanation in terms of large local time extent of events. Ann Geophys, 2000, 18(9): 1027–1042
31 Lockwood M, Moen J. Reconfiguration and closure of lobe flux by reconnection during northward IMF: possible evidence for signatures in cusp/cleft auroral emissions. Ann Geophys, 1999, 17(8): 996–1011
32 Milan S E, Lester M, Cowley S W H, et al. Dayside convection and auroral morphology during an interval of northward interplanetary magnetic field. Ann Geophys, 2000, 18(4): 436–444
33 Moen J, Lockwood M, Sandholt P E, et al. Variability of dayside high latitude convection associated with a sequence of auroral transients. J Atmos Terr Phys, 1996, 58(1-4): 85–96
34 Safargaleev V, Kozlovsky A, Sergienko T, et al. Optical, radar, and magnetic observations of magnetosheath plasma capture during a positive IMF Bz impulse. Ann Geophys, 2008, 26(3): 517–531
35 Thorolfsson A, Cerisier J C, Lockwood M, et al. Simultaneous optical and radar signatures of poleward-moving auroral forms. Ann Geophys, 2000, 18(9): 1054–1066
36 Cowley S W H, Lockwood M. Excitation and decay of solar wind-driven flows in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system. Ann Geophys, 1992, 10(12): 103–115
37 Huang C S, Sofko G J, Koustov A V, et al. Evolution of ionospheric multicell convection during northward interplanetary magnetic field with |Bz/By| > 1. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105(A12): 27095–27107
38 Hu H Q, Yeoman T K, Lester M, et al. Dayside flow bursts and high-latitude reconnection when the IMF is strongly northward. Ann Geophys, 2006, 24(8): 2227–2242
39 Rinne Y, Moen J, Carlson H C, et al. Stratification of east-west plasma flow channels observed in the ionospheric cusp in response to IMF By polarity changes. Geophys Res Lett, 2010, 37: L13102
DOI:
10.1029/2010GL043307
, 1, 2
