Vol.28, No.02. 2017
Table of Contents
ISSN:1674-9928
CN:31-2050/P
Chinese Antarctic Magnetometer Chain at the Cusp Latitude
LIU Yonghua1 
, HU Hongqiao1, YANG Huigen1, ZHANG Beichen1, SUN Bo1, WEI Fuhai1, LIU Yang1, LIU Jianjun1, WANG Rui1, CHEN Zhuotian1, HU Zejun1, HAN Desheng1, SHI Guitao1, HU Zhengyi1, WANG Tao1, AN Chunlei1, Mike Rose2
, HU Hongqiao1, YANG Huigen1, ZHANG Beichen1, SUN Bo1, WEI Fuhai1, LIU Yang1, LIU Jianjun1, WANG Rui1, CHEN Zhuotian1, HU Zejun1, HAN Desheng1, SHI Guitao1, HU Zhengyi1, WANG Tao1, AN Chunlei1, Mike Rose2
Correspondence: liuyonghua@pric.org.cn liuyonghua@pric.org.cn
ORCID:
Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp. 102-106 (2016) • DOI
Abstract
Basic Infomations
References
Attachments
Cited By
Abstract
A Chinese Antarctic Magnetometer (CAM) chain from Zhongshan Station (ZHS) to Dome-A (DMA) has been established since February 2009. A regular magnetometer is operated at ZHS, and four low power magnetometers are operated along the interior route from ZHS to DMA in the cusp latitude, extending over a distance of 1260 km. These stations fill an important void in the Antarctic magnetometer network. Furthermore, the CAM chain is magnetically conjugated with the Arctic region reaching from the Svalbard archipelago to Daneborg, on the east coast of Greenland. Conjugate measurements using the Arctic and Antarctic magnetometers provide excellent opportunities to investigate phenomena related to the coupling of the solar wind to the magnetosphere and ionosphere, such as magnetic impulse events, flux transfer events, traveling convection vortices and ultra-low frequency waves.
Author Address:
1 Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai 200136, China;
2 British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge CB3 0ET,the United Kingdom
2 British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge CB3 0ET,the United Kingdom
1 Lühr H. The IMAGE magnetometer network. STEP Int, 1994, 4(10): 4–6
2 Stauning P, Clauer C R, Rosenberg T J, et al. Observations of solar-wind-driven progression of interplanetary magnetic field BY-related dayside ionospheric disturbances. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100(A5): 7567–7585
3 Hughes W J, Engebretson M J. MACCS: Magnetometer array for cusp and cleft studies//Lockwood M, Wild M N, Opgenoorth H J. Satellite—ground based coordination sourcebook, ESA-SP-1198. Eur.Noordwijk, The Netherlands:European Space Agency Publication, 1997: 119–123
4 Clauer C R, Kim H, Deshpande K, et al. An Autonomous adaptive low-power instrument platform (AAL-PIP) for remote high-latitude geospace data collection. Geosci Instrum Methods Data Syst Dis, 2014, 3(2): 211–227
5 Kivelson M G, Russell C T. Introduction to space physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995
6 Barnes A. Theory of generation of bow-shock-associated hydromagnetic waves in the upstream interplanetary medium. Cosm Electrodyn, 1970, 1: 90–114
7 Southwood D J. The hydromagnetic stability of the magnetospheric boundary. Planet Space Sci, 1968, 16(5): 587–605
8 Liu Y H, Fraser B J, Menk F W, et al. Pc2 EMIC waves generated high off the equator in the dayside outer magnetosphere. Geophy Res Lett, 2012, 39(17), L17102, doi:10.1029/2012GL053082.
9 Pilipenko V A, Engebretson M J. Ground images at high latitudes of ULF wave processes in the outer magnetosphere. J Atmos Solar Terrest Phys, 2002, 64(2): 183–201
10 Liu Y H, Fraser B J, Liu R Y, et al. Conjugate phase studies of ULF waves in the Pc5 band near the cusp. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108(A7): 1274
11 Liu Y H, Fraser B J, Ables S T, et al. Transverse-scale size of Pc3 ULF waves near the exterior cusp. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114(A8): A08208
12 Russell C T, Elphic R C. Initial ISEE magnetometer results: magnetopause observations. Space Sci Rev, 1978, 22(6): 681–715
13 Fear R C, Milan S E, Raeder J, et al. Asymmetry in the bipolar signatures of flux transfer events. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115(A11): A11217
14 Milan S E, Imber S M, Carter J A, et al. What controls the local time extent of flux transfer events?. J Geophys Res, 2016, 121(2): 1391–1401
15 Tavares M, Santiago M A M. What are traveling convection vortices?. Braz J Phys, 1999, 29(3): 524–528
16 Moretto T, Hesse M, Yahnin A, et al. Magnetospheric signature of an ionospheric traveling convection vortex event. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107(A6): SMP 5-1–SMP 5-9
17 Southwood D J, Kivelson M G. The magnetohydrodynamic response of the magnetospheric cavity to changes in solar wind pressure. J Geophys Res, 1990, 95(A3): 2301–2309
