Vol.31, No.03. 2020
Table of Contents
ARTICLE | Oceanography/Sea Ice
Multi-sensor data merging of sea ice concentration and thickness
Correspondence: Keguang.email@example.com ORCID:
With the rapid change in the Arctic sea ice, a large number of sea ice observations have been collected in recent years, and it is expected that an even larger number of such observations will emerge in the coming years. To make the best use of these observations, in this paper we develop a multi-sensor optimal data merging (MODM) method to merge any number of different sea ice observations. Since such merged data are independent on model forecast, they are valid for model initialization and model validation. Based on the maximum likelihood estimation theory, we prove that any model assimilated with the merged data is equivalent to assimilating the original multi-sensor data. This greatly facilitates sea ice data assimilation, particularly for operational forecast with limited computational resources. We apply the MODM method to merge sea ice concentration (SIC) and sea ice thickness (SIT), respectively, in the Arctic. For SIC merging, the Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMIS) and Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) data are merged together with the Norwegian Ice Service ice chart. This substantially reduces the uncertainties at the ice edge and in the coastal areas. For SIT merging, the daily Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) data is merged with the weekly-mean merged CryoSat-2 and SMOS (CS2SMOS) data. This generates a new daily CS2SMOS SIT data with better spatial coverage for the whole Arctic.
1 Division of Ocean and Ice, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway; 2 Division of Remote Sensing and Data Management, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway; 3 Division of Remote Sensing and Data Management, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Tromsø, Norway
Buehner M, Caya A, Pogson L, et al. 2013. A new environment Canada regional ice analysis system. Atmosphere-Ocean, 51(1): 18-34, doi: 10.1080/07055900.2012.747171.
Buehner M, Caya A, Carrieres T, et al. 2016. Assimilation of SSMIS and ASCAT data and the replacement of highly uncertain estimates in the Environment Canada Regional Ice Prediction System. QJR Meteorol Soc, 142(695): 562-573, doi: 10.1002/qj.2408.
Caya A, Buehner M, Carrieres T. 2010. Analysis and forecasting of sea ice conditions with three-dimensional variational data assimilation and a coupled ice–ocean model. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 27(2): 353-369, doi: 10.1175/2009jtecho701.1.
Daley R. 1991. Atmospheric data analysis (Cambridge atmospheric and space science series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dinessen F, Hackett B. 2016. Product user manual for regional high resolution sea ice charts Svalbard region, PUM for Sea Ice TAC regional Arctic sea ice product. SEAICE_ARC_SEAICE_L4_ NRT_OBSERVATIONS_011_002, Issue: 2.7, 15 January 2018. http://marine.copernicus.eu/documents/PUM/CMEMS-OSI-PUM-011-002.pdf.
Fritzner S M, Graversen R G, Wang K G, et al. 2018. Comparison between a multi-variate nudging method and the ensemble Kalman filter for sea-ice data assimilation. J Glaciol, 64(245): 387-396, doi: 10.1017/jog.2018.33.
Fritzner S, Graversen R, Christensen K H, et al. 2019. Impact of assimilating sea ice concentration, sea ice thickness and snow depth in a coupled ocean–sea ice modelling system. Cryosphere, 13(2): 491-509, doi: 10.5194/tc-13-491-2019.
Horn R A, Johnson C R. 2013. Matrix analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 431.
IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change//Core Writing Team, Pachauri R K, Meyer L A. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151.
Kalnay E, Li H, Miyoshi T, et al. 4-D-Var or ensemble Kalman filter? Tellus A, 2007, 59(5): 758-773.
Lavergne T, Sørensen A M, Kern S, et al. 2019. Version 2 of the EUMETSAT OSI SAF and ESA CCI sea-ice concentration climate data records. Cryosphere, 13(1): 49-78, doi: 10.5194/tc-13-492019.
Laxon S W, Giles K A, Ridout A L, et al. 2013. CryoSat-2 estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume. Geophys Res Lett, 40(4): 732-737, doi: 10.1002/grl.50193.
Lindsay R W, Zhang J. 2006. Assimilation of ice concentration in an ice–ocean model. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 23(5): 742-749, doi: 10.1175/jtech1871.1.
Lisæter K A, Rosanova J, Evensen G. 2003. Assimilation of ice concentration in a coupled ice—ocean model, using the Ensemble Kalman filter. Ocean Dyn, 53(4): 368-388, doi: 10.1007/s10236-003- 0049-4.
Melsheimer C. 2019. ASI Version 5 Sea Ice Concentration User Guide, Version V0.92 (August 4, 2019). University of Bremen.
Posey P G, Metzger E J, Wallcraft A J, et al. 2015. Improving Arctic sea ice edge forecasts by assimilating high horizontal resolution sea ice concentration data into the US Navy’s ice forecast systems. Cryosphere, 9: 1735-1745, doi: 10.5194/tc-9-1735-2015.
Ricker R, Hendricks S, Kaleschke L, et al. 2017. A weekly Arctic sea-ice thickness data record from merged CryoSat-2 and SMOS satellite data. Cryosphere, 11(4): 1607-1623, doi: 10.5194/tc-11-1607-2017.
Sakov P, Counillon F, Bertino L, et al. 2012. TOPAZ4: an ocean-sea ice data assimilation system for the North Atlantic and Arctic. Ocean Sci, 8(4): 633-656, doi: 10.5194/os-8-633-2012.
Spreen G, Kaleschke L, Heygster G. 2008. Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89-GHz channels. J Geophys Res-Oceans, 113(C2): C02S03, doi: 10.1029/2005jc003384.
Stark J D, Ridley J, Martin M, et al. 2008. Sea ice concentration and motion assimilation in a sea ice–ocean model. J Geophys Res-Oceans, 113(C5): C05S91, doi: 10.1029/2007jc004224.
Tian-Kunze X, Kaleschke L, Maaß N, et al. 2014. SMOS-derived thin sea ice thickness: algorithm baseline, product specifications and initial verification. Cryosphere, 8(3): 997-1018, doi: 10.5194/tc-8-997-2014.
Tietsche S, Notz D, Jungclaus J H, et al. 2013. Assimilation of sea-ice concentration in a global climate model–physical and statistical aspects. Ocean Sci, 9: 19-36, doi: 10.5194/os-9-19-2013.
Todling R. 1999. Estimation theory and foundations of atmospheric data assimilation. DAO Office Note 1999-01.
Tonboe R T, Eastwood S, Lavergne T, et al. 2016. The EUMETSAT sea ice concentration climate data record. Cryosphere, 10(5): 2275-2290, doi: 10.5194/tc-10-2275-2016.
Wang K G, Debernard J, Sperrevik A K, et al. 2013. A combined optimal interpolation and nudging scheme to assimilate OSISAF sea-ice concentration into ROMS. Ann Glaciol, 54(62): 8-12, doi: 10.3189/2013aog62a138.
Waters J, Lea D J, Martin M J, et al. 2015. Implementing a variational data assimilation system in an operational 1/4 degree global ocean model. QJR Meteorol Soc, 141(687): 333-349, doi: 10.1002/qj.2388.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 1970. WMO sea-ice nomenclature: terminology, codes, illustrated glossary and symbols. Geneva: Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization. 145.
Yang Q H, Losa S N, Losch M, et al. 2014. Assimilating SMOS sea ice thickness into a coupled ice-ocean model using a local SEIK filter. J Geophys Res-Oceans, 119(10): 6680-6692, doi: 10.1002/2014jc 009963.
Zhang J L, Thomas D R, Rothrock D A, et al. 2003. Assimilation of ice motion observations and comparisons with submarine ice thickness data. J Geophys Res-Oceans, 108(C6): 3170, doi: 10.1029/2001jc 001041.